News Story: Full Text
Sponsored By
Cleveland Clinic Brain Tumor and Neuro-Oncology Center
Please Click On The Above Banner For More Details
Braintumor Website


Irinotecan in the treatment of glioma patients.


Al Musella's Comments: (This is his personal views and are not necessarily the views of the Musella Foundation!)



Website: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=12712456&dopt=Abstract

Posted on: 04/29/2003

1: Cancer 2003 May 1;97(9 Suppl):2352-8

Irinotecan in the treatment of glioma patients.

Buckner JC, Reid JM, Wright K, Kaufmann SH, Erlichman C, Ames M, Cha S, O'Fallon JR, Schaaf LJ, Miller LL.

Division of Medical Oncology and Developmental Oncology Research, Cancer Center Statistics Unit, Mayo Clinic and Mayo Foundation, Rochester, Minnesota.

Other than nitrosoureas (carmustine and lomustine) and temozolomide, no agents have consistently demonstrated clinically meaningful benefits for patients with gliomas. The active metabolite of irinotecan, 7-ethyl-10-hydroxy camptothecin (SN-38), exhibited promising antitumor effects in preclinical glioma models. Clinicial trials using weekly or every 3 weeks dosing of irinotecan have been completed. Toxicity consisted primarily of mild to moderate neutropenia and diarrhea with both schedules, with occasional severe toxicity including one death from neutropenia and infection. Preliminary analyses have suggested imaging responses in 10-15% of patients. Preclinical models and our understanding of the mechanism of action suggest that irinotecan may sensitize glioma cells to the cytotoxic actions of radiation therapy and alkylating agents; clinical trials designed to assess the therapeutic benefit of combination therapy currently are in progress. There is substantial clincial evidence that the concurrent administration of irinotecan with certain anticonvulsants produces reduced exposure to SN-38. In the absence of anticonvulsants, there is also substantial interpatient variability in drug exposure, perhaps reflecting inherited differences in drug metabolism. Finally several mechanisms of tumor cell resistance to irinotecan have been hypothesized, but the clinical significance of these observations has not been confirmed. Correlative studies to address these pharmacokinetic, pharmacogenetic, and drug resistance questions are ongoing

.Cancer 2003;97(9 Suppl):2352-8. Copyright 2003 American Cancer SocietyDOI 10.1002/cncr.11304

PMID: 12712456 [PubMed - in process]



Click HERE to return to brain tumor news headlines


Home | Brain Tumor Guide | FAQs | Find A Treatment
Noteworthy Treatments | News | Virtual Trial | Videos | Novocure Optune® | Newsletter
Donations | Brain Tumor Centers | Survivor Stories | Temodar®
Fundraising For Research | Unsubscribe | Contact Us

Copyright (c) 1993 - 2020 by:
The Musella Foundation For Brain Tumor Research & Information, Inc
1100 Peninsula Blvd
Hewlett, NY 11557
888-295-4740